The challenge
Our client was a 10-year-old boy with exceptional academic potential who lived in an area served by grammar schools. During Year 5, concerns were raised by his primary school regarding his ability to effectively put his thoughts into writing, meaning that his assessment results did not fully reflect his true academic capabilities.
To better understand these difficulties, the family commissioned an independent Educational Psychology assessment. The assessment confirmed that the child was exceptionally able but also identified a neurological condition that affected his ability to perform in the specific format of the 11+ examination.
Unfortunately, the report was received after the deadline for applying to the Special Access Panel, meaning the child was unable to obtain reasonable adjustments for the examination. He subsequently did not achieve the required score.
The family appealed to the Selection Review Panel, arguing that the child’s performance had been affected by exceptional circumstances and that he was clearly of grammar school ability. The appeal was rejected, leaving the family facing the prospect of the child attending a secondary school with lower academic performance and less suitable SEN provision.
Our approach
We worked closely with the family to build a strong and persuasive appeal case.
Our work included:
- Reviewing the Selection Review Panel’s decision and supporting evidence
- Analysing the Educational Psychology report and academic records
- Preparing detailed appeal submissions challenging the fairness of the earlier decision
- Presenting evidence that the child was clearly of grammar school ability
- Demonstrating the significant educational prejudice the child would suffer if denied a grammar school place.
Our submissions focused on ensuring that the Independent Appeal Panel fully understood both the child’s academic potential and the impact of his neurological condition on his examination performance.
The outcome
The appeal was successful, and the child secured a place at his preferred grammar school.
The outcome ensured that he could continue his education in an environment better aligned with his academic abilities while also benefiting from more appropriate support provision. The family expressed their delight with the result and commented that it had changed the trajectory of their son’s future.
Why this matters
This case demonstrates the importance of presenting robust evidence where a child’s academic performance has been affected by a disability, neurological condition or other exceptional circumstances. It also highlights that an unsuccessful outcome at an earlier stage of the admissions process does not necessarily prevent a successful appeal.
With expert advice, detailed preparation and effective advocacy, families can secure educational placements that better reflect a child’s abilities and long-term educational needs.
How can we help you?
We advise parents on:
- Grammar school admission appeals
- School admissions disputes
- Special Educational Needs (SEN)
- Disability discrimination
- Reasonable adjustments in education settings.
If you require support with a grammar school admission appeal or another education law matter, our team can provide clear, practical advice tailored to your family’s circumstances.
